Time and again there has been enough discussions on how sexism and casteism are intertwined. However “Brahmanical
Patriarchy” is an exclusive case whose roots date back to centuries. It is the
patriarchy that opened ways for more revived forms of discrimination and
cruelty against women. To understand Brahmanical patriarchy one must be aware
of the ‘gifts’ bestowed upon the Brahmins by their revered Manu Smriti.
· Manu approves Brahmins to have illicit
relationship with Shudra woman and also to abandon them and any child born of
the relationship.
· It also debars Shudras and women (even if
born Brahmin) from reading the Vedas. Thus reducing the competition for Brahmin
men.
· It qualifies woman as a potential threat threat
to any man citing them as the most harmful creatures capable of seduction,greed,etc., and
warns men to avoid their company.
These
are only very few gems from the script. Also there are ample evidences in
History that the Malabar Kings sent their newly wed wives to the priests for
first night to deflower them as the fresh nuptials of a woman has to be a gift
to god which can be accomplished only when a Brahmin enjoys her. The priests
were even paid for that.
More
shamefully, the Brahmins went on a spree proclaiming any woman of their choice
to please them as and when required in the guise of “Service to God.”
Ambedkar states, “The Burgose pope went down in history as the most debauched predators in the name of spiritual service. One wonders whether the Brahmins of India are any better than them.”
Sure,
Patriarchy is deep rooted around the globe irrespective of class and castes.
But in India, Brahmanism that triumphed over Buddhism, paved way for more
injustice and assault against women who were climbing the social ladder under
Buddhist regime.
One
may argue that the gems from Manu smriti cannot be held accountable now in 21st
century to spew venom against a community. But one should remember that the
same community still benefits from the script as a result of prolonged
prejudice against the marginalized and till now nobody from the community has
condemned any part of it. Also to be remembered is the fact that the Brahmins were the most opposing group when the The Hindu code bill was constituted to improve the social status of women in India.
As much as Manu gave leeway to the Brahmins to wrong others, the Brahmins themselves went on a spree interpreting and executing more than what was in it. Which means the horrors committed by Brahmins are more than what was in the wicked script. Hence it becomes necessary the evil be uprooted which will eventually make its branches (other forms of patriarchy) wither away.
As much as Manu gave leeway to the Brahmins to wrong others, the Brahmins themselves went on a spree interpreting and executing more than what was in it. Which means the horrors committed by Brahmins are more than what was in the wicked script. Hence it becomes necessary the evil be uprooted which will eventually make its branches (other forms of patriarchy) wither away.
Brahmins
annoyed by the term should reconsider what “Brahminism” actually stands for
and hold themselves accountable instead of feigning ignorance which they
usually do.
Link to this article on women's web: https://www.womensweb.in/2019/04/brahmanical-patriarchy-a-brief-history/
Comments
Post a Comment