Feminism is a constantly evolving
ideology, keeping it in par with the issues that need to be addressed at every
passing time. Over the centuries, there have been innumerable
demands that were at the forefront of feminist movements, which were revived
upon time based on the growing demands and developments in society. This
can be best understood when read in conjunction with the demands fought for in
first wave feminism to till now. Some demands, even if claimed to have been
achieved, is still not accessible to all the women around the globe. This
‘evolution’ is what makes feminism more inclusive to get associated with and
understood through the lens of any other form of discrimination. Thus
‘Intersectionality’ has become a key component of feminism. The struggle for freedom
is powered by minds that are deprived of freedom-those that know the value of
freedom more than anyone else. Hence feminism has evolved over time as an
inclusive platform to fight for the demands of myriad marginalized groups. In
other words, it can be safely said that women were the most oppressed in all
the discriminated groups, hence the inclusiveness has come handy.
Reading Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, one cannot help but draw parallels to his views on
Dalit reformation to Women’s equality. However, Babasaheb himself is a great
feminist and has been very vocal about the issues faced by women and their
empowerment. In his book “Castes in India” he emphasizes the sorry state of
shudra women compared to Brahmin women by the following words, “A Brahmin woman
after childbirth is up to reclaiming her day job whereas a Shudra woman has no
place to go.” But one should not mistake him as being partial. He was just
stating the obvious as the women in top echelons of the society are well off
than those at the bottom, which is very much true to date. However, he has
time and again captured the ill fate of Brahmin women too in his writings. He
had come down heavily on the much revered Manu Smriti for its pivotal role in
discriminating Shudras and women, even if born Brahmin. The venom injected
through the Manu Smriti in the form of graded inequality had cost the women
heavily as they were banned from a self-respectful life - not just unequal but
unjust.
Some of the gems from the script
shall be looked into briefly to understand the miserable position allotted to
women in the Hindu religion;
"Na asti strinam..." - 9/18: Vedic mantras are not to be recited by women as they are impure and represent falsehood.
"Trinsha..." -9/93: In case of any problem in performing religious rites, males between the age of 24 and 30 should marry a female between the age of 8 and 12.
"Bharataram......" - 8/370: In case a woman, proud of her greatness, violates her duties towards her husband, the king shall arrange to have her thrown before dogs at a public place.
The problem that lies within:
It is generally said, “Women are
women’s best enemies”. Though it is yet another gimmick by the male population
to derail the feminist movement and divert the attention from the more dangerous
perpetrators i.e men, the situations were women were not supportive to fellow women
cannot be ignored. The patriarchal mindset is so ingrained that some women are sadly misogynists. But one must also care to look behind
the reasons for women holding those ideologies. That is what they have been
taught from childhood and that is the ‘normal’ for them in the male privileged
world. Though some women have had the opportunity and exposure to come out of
it, the ones who did not have the privilege cannot be held accountable wholly.
Ambedkar while advocating separate
electorates for Dalits, does not shun away from stating, “Dalits will not vote for Dalits over Hindus, for they have a strong
belief that Hindus are superior and more eligible than the untouchables.”
Though the ignorance within the community is, of course, to be eliminated, it
cannot be stated as the only and foremost problem. The grounds on which this
ignorance is based is the unearned privilege and manipulation from time
immemorial. Ambedkar who has relentlessly worked within the community could
clearly see the root of the problems. He has shown us the need to uproot the
evil without passing the blame on the victims as an easy way to thwart corrective
measures. Similarly, it is important for feminists to not get discouraged by the
ignorant acts of misogynist women but keep moving forward in the path of
Babasaheb.
In his book, "Waiting for a Visa", Ambedkar enlists a few incidents of discrimination that happened to him and others. He reiterates the fact that untouchables are considered untouchables across all religions. Even a Parsi and Muslim thinks low of an untouchable though they don't practice Hinduism. Similarly, women are considered "inferior" across all religions and every religion has its own way of discriminating against women. The only principle that unifies all religions in the world is the fact that they have all failed women miserably.
Ambedkar, the reformist has left his life and acts as an open book for interpretations. His advocacy for Reservation still holds as valid grounds for advocating Women's Reservation. He cannot be put in a box as a Dalit leader, but a visionary who lived for all the marginalized. Whatever be the grounds of discrimination, we can take a leaf from his book to fight against it untiringly.
Link to this article in women's web
Link to this article in feminism in india
Link to this article in women's web
Link to this article in feminism in india
Comments
Post a Comment